Consulting

Embedded Support for the Long Haul

Some change efforts need more than a workshop — they need someone who rolls up their sleeves and does the actual work alongside your team, not a consultant who hands over a strategy deck and walks away. This engagement covers both sides: the strategy behind all eleven phases of TAP, and the hands-on execution it takes to get every tool built, run, and delivered to your internal teams — working, not theoretical.

How This Is Different

Strategy tells you what to do. This does the work.

Most consulting stops at the recommendation. I stay past it — personally building the deliverables, personally running the sessions with your internal teams, and delivering finished, working tools instead of a slide deck your team is left to execute alone.

● Typical Change Consulting
  • × A strategy deck of recommendations, then the consultant moves on
  • × Your internal team is left to build and run every tool themselves
  • × Advice given in review meetings, not work done in the room
  • × A "coach" who critiques your plan instead of building it with you
  • × Engagement ends at the strategy phase — execution is on you
● TikVah Embedded Consulting
  • I personally build the Readiness Assessment, Playbook, and every tool artifact
  • I run the stakeholder, resistance, and communication work directly with your internal teams
  • Deliverables are completed and handed off working, not theoretical
  • Strategy and execution both, from the first assessment through go-live
  • Your team walks away with finished work, not a to-do list
The Framework

TAP — the TikVah Adoption Plan

Eleven phases, run in sequence and revisited as the rollout unfolds — not a one-time checklist. In this engagement, I run the entire framework directly alongside your internal stakeholders, not just teach it to them.

The TAP Framework — eleven phases, shown as a circular map A circular diagram of the eleven phases of TAP, the TikVah Adoption Plan, arranged clockwise around a center hub, looping back to the start. TAP TikVah Adoption Plan 1 Getting Ready 2 Ownership &Shared Need 3 Vision &Direction 4 Stakeholders &Commitment 5 Resistance &Momentum 6 Building Support 7 Responsibility Grid 8 Communication Plan 9 Monitoring &Milestones 10 Systems &Structures 11 Leading &Communicating
  • 1
    Getting Ready
    Team kickoff and ground rules.
  • 2
    Ownership & Shared Need
    Who's accountable, and why now.
  • 3
    Vision & Direction
    The picture of success, and the pitch to explain it.
  • 4
    Stakeholders & Commitment
    Who's affected, and where they stand.
  • 5
    Resistance & Momentum
    Why people resist, and what's already working.
  • 6
    Building Support
    Turning resistance into a win-win plan.
  • 7
    Responsibility Grid
    Who decides, who executes.
  • 8
    Communication Plan
    What gets said, to whom, and when.
  • 9
    Monitoring & Milestones
    Checkpoints that catch drift early.
  • 10
    Systems & Structures
    The policies and incentives that reinforce it.
  • 11
    Leading & Communicating
    The leadership behaviors that make it real.
Two Ways In

Whether the project is stalled or just misaligned, TAP Consulting meets it where it is

This isn't only a rescue engagement for a project that's dead in the water. Just as often, it's a rollout that's still moving but has drifted from real stakeholder buy-in — and needs change management brought back into alignment before that drift becomes a stall.

● Without Embedded Change Support
Adoption RiskCritical
  • × A rollout that's technically on track but quietly losing internal buy-in
  • × Momentum stalled, and nobody's sure who owns getting it moving again
  • × Stakeholders engaged inconsistently, resistance handled ad hoc
  • × Change management bolted on after the fact, if at all
  • × Internal team stretched too thin to run TAP themselves
● With TikVah Embedded
Adoption RiskMinimal
  • TikVah runs all eleven phases of TAP directly alongside your internal stakeholders
  • A stalled initiative gets diagnosed and restarted with real ownership assigned
  • A project already in motion gets brought back into alignment, phase by phase
  • Resistance surfaced and worked through in real time, not guessed at
  • A self-sustaining plan your team can run without me once the engagement ends
Consulting Engagement

TAP Consulting

This isn't strategy handed off for your team to figure out execution on their own. For organizations mid-rollout, recovering from a stalled initiative, or preparing for a change too complex for a single workshop, I embed directly with the team — typically over a 4 to 12 week engagement — to personally build every deliverable, personally run every session, and deliver finished, working tools directly to your internal teams across all eleven phases of TAP. Strategy and execution, done by the same person, not split between a consultant who advises and a team left to implement it alone. Because it's embedded rather than a single event, the work adapts as real situations come up — which is usually where the actual behavior change happens.

Duration: 4–12 Week Engagements Format: Remote, Onsite, or Hybrid Best For: Mid-Rollout or Stalled Initiatives
  • 1
    TAP Readiness Assessment
    I personally run a structured diagnostic scoring where a change stands across all eleven phases of TAP — Getting Ready through Leading & Communicating — and exactly where it's likely to stall before it does.
  • 2
    Custom TAP Playbook Build
    I build the eleven-phase framework into a finished plan around your organization's structure, culture, and timeline — delivered to your team, not a generic template you have to adapt yourself.
  • 3
    Stakeholder & Resistance Work
    I run the Stakeholder Map, Support Scale, Resistance Diagnosis, and Win-Win Action List live with your internal teams as real stakeholders surface mid-rollout — the work gets done in the room, not assigned as homework.
  • 4
    Leadership Coaching & Hands-On Delivery
    Recurring 1:1 or small-group work with the leaders accountable for the change — part coaching, part me directly building out the artifacts and next steps alongside them, keeping momentum and accountability alive between milestones.
  • 5
    Progress Monitoring & Course Correction
    I run ongoing check-ins against the milestone plan and personally make the adjustments in real time as the rollout actually unfolds.
  • 6
    Systems & Structures Audit
    I review policies, incentives, and reporting structures to identify what's quietly working against the change, and build the plan to fix it — not just flag it and move on.
The Complete Toolkit

44 tools, 8 categories, one framework

This is the actual toolkit run live with your internal stakeholders during the engagement — not a generic template. Every tool below maps to a phase of TAP and produces a specific, named outcome your team keeps using after the engagement ends.

+ Getting Ready  (9 Tools)

Outcome: A team that starts aligned — same mission, same scope, same ground rules — before any work begins.

Team Kickoff — Covers introductions, expectations, objectives, agenda, ground rules, roles, and icebreakers to get everyone started well.

MORE Checklist — A quick 1–5 rating of how clear and committed the group is on mission, ownership, routines, and engagement.

MORE Assessment — Detailed — A deeper 0–10 rating across the same four dimensions, broken into specific sub-elements.

Ground Rules & Charter — Checks alignment on scope, roles, decision-making, and operating agreements before work begins.

What's In Scope, What's Not — A visual exercise sorting what's clearly in scope, clearly out, or still up for debate.

One-Sentence Alignment Check — Each person writes a short statement of what the plan is about, then the group compares for shared language.

Why This Matters Check — Tests whether the plan's goals are genuinely linked to what matters most to the people and priorities involved.

Who's Involved, Start to Finish — Maps customers, outputs, process steps, inputs, and suppliers to define where the plan starts and stops.

Roles by Phase — Assigns each stakeholder a role — Approval, Resource, Membership, or Interested party — at each phase of the plan.

+ Ownership & Shared Need  (2 Tools)

Outcome: A concrete, evidence-backed case for why the change matters now, that the group actually believes.

Why Change Matrix — Frames the need for change as both threat and opportunity, over the short and long term.

Evidence for the Need — Gathers Data, Demonstration, and Demand — the three kinds of evidence that make the case for change.

+ Vision & Direction  (5 Tools)

Outcome: A specific, shared picture of success everyone can describe the same way.

Picture the Future — Asks everyone to picture a future success moment and describe what they'd see, hear, and feel.

More Of / Less Of — Lists specific behaviors you expect to see more of and less of once the plan succeeds.

The Short Pitch — A short, practiced pitch anyone involved can give to explain the plan clearly and consistently.

Vision to Behavior — Breaks the vision down into the mindsets and day-to-day behaviors that make it real.

What We Want to Be Known For — Surfaces the top things you want this plan to be known for by the people it affects.

+ Stakeholders & Commitment  (8 Tools)

Outcome: Every stakeholder mapped, rated, and assigned a concrete plan to bring them on board.

Who's Affected Map — A pie-chart view of which groups are affected by the plan, and how significantly.

Where People Stand — Estimates how a group splits across Innovators, Early Adopters, Late Adopters, and Resistors.

Stakeholder Support Tracker — Tracks where each stakeholder stands today versus where they need to be, and the gap to close.

Why People Resist — Sorts resistance into Technical, Political, or Cultural causes, and plans a response for each.

Building Support Plan — Builds a concrete plan — issues, win-win, actions, owners, dates — for winning over each key stakeholder.

Personal Transition Check-In — Uses the Letting Go / Neutral Zone / New Beginning model to guide one-on-one support conversations.

Responsibility Grid — Maps who decides and who executes at each phase, using simple decision and execution codes.

Stakeholder + Resistance Combined View — Combines stakeholder support levels with T-P-C resistance causes in a single view.

+ Making It Stick  (2 Tools)

Outcome: A clear read on whether the change will actually hold once the initial push is over.

Helping vs. Hindering Forces — Lists the forces helping the change take hold versus those working against it.

Staying Power Check — Checks early wins, commitment, excitement, resources, integration, and learning to see if the change will stick.

+ Monitoring & Milestones  (3 Tools)

Outcome: Early warning on drift, tracked against real behavior change — not just task completion.

Behavior Progress Tracker — Rates progress toward desired behaviors for each stakeholder, with follow-up actions.

Progress Check-In Questions — A checklist confirming objectives, milestones, and data are in place to track progress.

TAP Profile — Overall Progress Snapshot — A single chart rating how well each of the seven pillars is being used, to spot gaps.

+ Systems & Structures  (9 Tools)

Outcome: Policies, incentives, and structures that reinforce the change instead of quietly working against it.

Systems Impact Snapshot — Rates how much each system or structure (staffing, rewards, IT, etc.) will impact the plan.

Systems Action Plan — Lists what's helping or hindering in each system area, with an action, owner, and date.

Communication Quality Check — Rates communication against seven traits: clear, concise, consistent, complete, compelling, credible, two-way.

Skills & Support Needed — Identifies what skills or experience the plan needs and how to get them.

What Gets Measured & Reinforced — Checks whether current measures and rewards actually reinforce the behaviors the plan needs.

Aligning Reinforcement with Behavior — A deeper, step-by-step version linking specific behaviors to existing and needed measures and rewards.

Reinforcement Consequences Check — Checks whether desired behaviors lead to positive consequences, and undesired ones don't.

Reinforcement Quality Check — Rates existing rewards against traits like availability, visibility, timeliness, and flexibility.

Measurement Quality Check — Rates existing measures against traits like completeness, timeliness, cost, and importance.

+ Leading & Communicating  (6 Tools)

Outcome: Leadership behavior — and calendars — that actually match the priorities being asked of everyone else.

Leader Commitment — Names the specific time, focus, passion, and communication behaviors that show real leadership commitment.

Communication Channel Map — Maps which communication channels will be used for each phase of the plan.

Communication Plan — Telling — Plans what message goes to which audience, through what channel, and when.

Communication Plan — Listening — Plans how and when you'll actively listen to each audience, not just talk to them.

Time vs. Priorities Check — Compares your stated priorities against how your calendar actually looks, to spot the gap.

Leader Self-Check — A self-rating across all seven pillars to see where a leader is strong and where they need to grow.

Questions

Before you book this format

How long does this consulting engagement take, and who's it for?

Duration: 4–12 Week Engagements; Format: Remote, Onsite, or Hybrid; Best For: Mid-Rollout or Stalled Initiatives.

Is this available virtually?

Yes.

What happens after the consulting engagement ends?

Most engagements start with a discovery call, then move into this format. From there, some teams stop here; others expand into a deeper Change Mgmt. & TikVah Adoption Plan (TAP) engagement or bring in one of the other three pillars to close a different gap.

Don't Wait

Ready to Talk Through Your Rollout?

Or Call Us Directly (954) 770-2283